🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking compensation amounting to $230 billion from the financial institution Euroclear. This legal step represents a clear warning by the Kremlin against plans to use frozen Russian state assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in local state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount corresponds to the aforementioned $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to determine in the coming days regarding a proposal to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. The proposal entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary keeper for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that title of the sovereign wealth still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

Moscow, however, has called any utilization of the assets as theft. It has threatened retaliatory measures, including confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its funds. He added that the European Union, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.

Wider Implications

With statements interpreted as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the assets plan as "a vicious assault on property rights and the international reserves system established by the United States."

Euroclear declined to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with stronger ties to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that relevant assets can be located," stated a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on measures to discourage other countries from assisting any Russian legal action against EU companies. They are also designing safeguards to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the cash generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Kyiv would only be obligated to return the loan in the event that Russia agreed to pay compensation for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an alternative method for funding Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has already signaled its opposition.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is based on the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also significant," she stated. "It also delivers a clear signal that if you do all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."